Skip to main content

What's New

Owners fined for not furnishing particulars within the time period specified in requisition forms (Cases with judgments delivered on 3 July 2020)

On 3 July 2020, the owners of 7 tenements were fined at the Eastern Magistrates' Courts after pleading guilty to charges of not furnishing particulars within the time period specified in requisition forms issued in 2019 for the general revaluation of the year 2020/21.

Item Property District Nature of Offence Judgment
1 Residential Sai Kung Having refused or neglected to furnish particulars within the time period specified in a requisition form, contrary to section 46(a) of the Rating Ordinance and section 41(a) of the Government Rent (Assessment and Collection) Ordinance. Defendant was convicted and fined $ 1,500 under each Ordinance, making a total fine of $ 3,000.
2 Residential Tseung Kwan O Having refused or neglected to furnish particulars within the time period specified in a requisition form, contrary to section 46(a) of the Rating Ordinance and section 41(a) of the Government Rent (Assessment and Collection) Ordinance. Defendant was convicted and fined $ 2,000 under each Ordinance, making a total fine of $ 4,000.
3 Residential Tseung Kwan O Having refused or neglected to furnish particulars within the time period specified in a requisition form, contrary to section 46(a) of the Rating Ordinance and section 41(a) of the Government Rent (Assessment and Collection) Ordinance. Defendant was convicted and fined $ 1,500 under each Ordinance, making a total fine of $ 3,000.
4 Residential Kowloon Bay Having refused or neglected to furnish particulars within the time period specified in a requisition form, contrary to section 46(a) of the Rating Ordinance and section 41(a) of the Government Rent (Assessment and Collection) Ordinance. Defendant was convicted and fined $ 1,500 under each Ordinance, making a total fine of $ 3,000.
5 Residential Lam Tin Having refused or neglected to furnish particulars within the time period specified in a requisition form, contrary to section 46(a) of the Rating Ordinance and section 41(a) of the Government Rent (Assessment and Collection) Ordinance. Defendant was convicted and fined $ 1,500 under each Ordinance, making a total fine of $ 3,000.
6 Industrial Kwun Tong Having refused or neglected to furnish particulars within the time period specified in a requisition form, contrary to section 46(a) of the Rating Ordinance and section 41(a) of the Government Rent (Assessment and Collection) Ordinance. Defendant was convicted and fined $ 2,400 under each Ordinance, making a total fine of $ 4,800.
7 Shop Yuen Long Having refused or neglected to furnish particulars within the time period specified in a requisition form, contrary to section 46(a) of the Rating Ordinance and section 41(a) of the Government Rent (Assessment and Collection) Ordinance. Defendant was convicted and fined $ 1,500 under each Ordinance, making a total fine of $ 3,000.

Under the Rating Ordinance or the Government Rent (Assessment and Collection) Ordinance, any person who knowingly makes a false statement or refuses to furnish any of the particulars specified in the requisition form shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a maximum fine of $25,000 or $10,000. A person convicted of any of the aforesaid offences under any or both of the aforesaid Ordinances shall be liable to an additional fine equivalent to 3 times the amount of rates and/or Government rent undercharged.



8 July 2020
Top